Observation type
Snowpack Observer Anonymous Keep me anonymous if published yes Location (general area) Eastern San Gabriels Latitude Longitude Date (yyyymmdd) 20230121 Time 1100 Road conditions to area clear Temperature 28F Sky clear (no clouds) Wind speed Light (1-16mph Flags/twigs in motion) Wind direction NW Wind direction in degrees Slope aspect North Aspect in degrees Slope angle 25 Elevation 8350ft Snow depth 175cm Boot/ Ski penetration Precipitation None Activity, recent avalanches No Brief description Whumphing noises, shooting cracks. collapsing no Rapid warming yes Obvious avalanche path no Terrain trap no Comment Saturday AM tour near treeline in the SG mountains with the goal of scoping higher elevation snowpack and assess stability. Key takeaways on the approach: - Evidence of massive windloading present near ridgelines in the form of small cornices and wind lips. - Solar input was quickly melting huge chunks of rime ice from trees, littering ground with glass-like debris - Surface hoar observed at the start of the tour on clear, high elevation spots (see photo). It was getting zapped by the sun and warmer temps by early afternoon. - Snow surface is highly variable on all but the most protected aspects. Currently a mix of ice, windboard, sastrugi and granular wind-drifted snow. - Some faceted snow on highest, steepest aspects. Looks like it's rounding as temps have steadily increased in recent days. Dug a pit on a NNE test slope near where we planned to ski, that was obviously affected by windloading, so take with a grain of salt. - 175cm deep - 4F 155-175 - melt/freeze crust at 155 - pencil hard from 155 to ground with faintly visible layers (no pronounced crusts, though) - CT12 failure at 165, Q3 shear. - column was cohesive and seemingly well bonded below soft snow surface Key takeaways for me are that the snowpack does appear to be bonding, although the primary concerns are still large swaths of boilerplate/ice and some breakable crusts that pose danger in exposed terrain. Publish this observation Yes I would like this observation Published |